<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: T-Mobile Cameo: cool device, unconvincing business model</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.connectedplanetonline.com/unfiltered/2008/11/19/t-mobile-cameo-cool-product-unconvincing-business-model/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.connectedplanetonline.com/unfiltered/2008/11/19/t-mobile-cameo-cool-product-unconvincing-business-model/</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2011 18:53:59 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: hemmant jha</title>
		<link>http://blog.connectedplanetonline.com/unfiltered/2008/11/19/t-mobile-cameo-cool-product-unconvincing-business-model/comment-page-1/#comment-308</link>
		<dc:creator>hemmant jha</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2009 14:33:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.connectedplanetonline.com/unfiltered/2008/11/19/t-mobile-cameo-cool-product-unconvincing-business-model/#comment-308</guid>
		<description>I purchased a Cameo since the price for device+service was reduced recently, and I&#039;ve found it to be quite good and painless. It is, by far, the best frame in terms of connectivity, since it does not rely on local wifi networks - send an image from any phone or any email address without a computer as intermediary. I&#039;ve written about it here : 

  http://thinkmoreinc.wordpress.com/2009/05/02/78/  

The T-Mobile new customer policy regarding the Cameo is puzzling - my local stores claim that anyone can be a Cameo customer, while a call placed to T-Mobile by one of my readers suggests that either the sender or the recipient [if given as a gift] needs to be a customer, but not both. In any case, T-Mobile is shooting itself in the foot because of such policies. The device is simple and painless to use - why should the buying experience not be the same?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I purchased a Cameo since the price for device+service was reduced recently, and I&#8217;ve found it to be quite good and painless. It is, by far, the best frame in terms of connectivity, since it does not rely on local wifi networks &#8211; send an image from any phone or any email address without a computer as intermediary. I&#8217;ve written about it here : </p>
<p>  http://thinkmoreinc.wordpress.com/2009/05/02/78/  </p>
<p>The T-Mobile new customer policy regarding the Cameo is puzzling &#8211; my local stores claim that anyone can be a Cameo customer, while a call placed to T-Mobile by one of my readers suggests that either the sender or the recipient [if given as a gift] needs to be a customer, but not both. In any case, T-Mobile is shooting itself in the foot because of such policies. The device is simple and painless to use &#8211; why should the buying experience not be the same?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

